|
DESPITE PRESIDENT KIM DAE JUNG'S
INTERNATIONAL REPUTATION as a champion of democracy, capped with a 2000
Nobel Peace Prize, he has an uneasy relationship with the domestic press.
While South Korean media are generally far more free under Kim's administration
than at any time in recent history, they remain susceptible to government
interference. Tensions between the administration and the press were heightened
in the immediate aftermath of the historic June summit meeting between Kim
Dae Jung and North Korean leader, Kim Jong Il (See "North Korea").
The summit marked the first time that North and South Korean leaders had
ever met. Kim Dae Jung's visit to Pyongyang was the biggest media event
in the region since the 1988 Seoul Olympics. Hundreds of foreign journalists,
barred from North Korea, converged instead on the South Korean capital.
There, they were fed pool reports filed by the 50 South Korean journalists,
including 18 print reporters, who were permitted to cover the talks in North
Korea.
South Korean media were constrained not only by the myriad restrictions
imposed by Pyongyang, but also by a general desire to avoid reporting that
could jeopardize reunification efforts. While the media vigorously debated
the details of Kim Dae Jung's Sunshine Policy of engagement with North Korea,
the summit meeting and the general goal of reunification were wildly popular
among journalists as well as the general public.
However, the euphoria evaporated quickly. On June 20, less than a week after
the summit's conclusion, officials banned Kim Jin Kook, a reporter for the
newspaper JoongAng Ilbo, from attending press conferences at Blue
House, the president's official residence. Presidential aides accused the
reporter of publishing information that had been provided on an off-the-record
basis.
That morning, JoongAng Ilbo had reported that Kim Jong Il agreed
during the summit talks to strike a clause from the Communist Party's charter
calling for the communist takeover of South Korea, and that he had responded
favorably to Kim Dae Jung's assertion that a continued U.S. military presence
was beneficial to regional security. A presidential spokesman justified
the ban on Kim Jin Kook by saying, "if media reports cause problems and
have negative effects on inter-Korean relations, it is committing a sin
[against] our people."
The newspaper claimed to have obtained the information from a highly placed
confidential source within the government, and not from the Blue House meeting.
Local journalists were divided on whether JoongAng's suspension from
Blue House constituted a press freedom violation, with some convinced that
the newspaper had in fact abused its privileges.
On June 21, the opposition Grand National Party (GNP) issued a statement
repeating the allegations that had already appeared in JoongAng Ilbo.
A party spokesman said that Kim Dae Jung had briefed GNP leader Lee Hoi
Chang about the summit details on June 18, but that Lee had honored the
president's request to avoid antagonizing the North by releasing the information
prematurely. On June 22, Blue House barred the daily Chosun Ilbo's
journalists from its press briefings for reporting on the same story, although
by then the news was an open secret.
In an editorial published the following day, Chosun said: "If it
was a secret that had to be closely guarded, then the government officials
should have been discreet from the beginning. But opposition leaders knew,
and so did many other delegates to the summit. It was inevitable that the
information would be leaked sooner or later."
Chosun Ilbo, South Korea's most conservative newspaper, was again
at the center of controversy in July, when North Korean propaganda broadcasts
described the daily as "a stumbling block [on] the road of national unification,"
adding that "it is the natural course of things to blow up such stumbling
blocks." Meanwhile, the GNP accused the government of remaining "silent
on the North's attempts to tame the South Korean media," referring also
to a June 27 incident when a Chosun Ilbo reporter was barred from
entering North Korea. A South Korean government spokesman subsequently urged
the North to refrain from such destructive rhetoric, but added that "the
South Korean media and political leaders must be patient and think of the
sound and healthy development of inter-Korean relations."
Some journalists feared that Kim's so-called Sunshine Policy of better relations
with North Korea was beginning to have a negative impact on press freedom,
with members of the administration actively discouraging journalists from
reporting critically on the North for fear of disrupting fragile relations.
In August, in a bid to round up South Korean press support for reunification,
Pyongyang invited 46 South Korean media executives to meet with their North
Korean counterparts, who were mostly propaganda officials. After a week
of meetings, both sides pledged to "work towards national reunification
and unity, cease mutual slandering, [and] promote inter-Korean media exchange,"
according to a report by the South Korean state news agency Yonhap. While
improved access to the North for South Korean journalists should mean more
in-depth reporting on the peninsula, some analysts told CPJ that the inevitable
compromises with Pyongyang would hamper independent coverage.
Local human rights activists hoped that one outcome of the summit might
be the abolition of the harsh National Security Law, which has been used
in the past to punish media outlets that publish or broadcast views deemed
to be anti-state, especially material seen as sympathetic to North Korea
or communism generally. Criminal defamation laws remain on the books, and
have been used against journalists in recent years, although there were
no new cases in 2000.
|