|
|
|
KYRGYSTAN
Emboldened by the growing number of U.S. troops in
the country, President Askar Akayev has used the threat of international
terrorism as an excuse to curb political dissent and suppress the independent
and opposition media in Kyrgyzstan. Compliant courts often issue exorbitant
damage awards in politically motivated libel suits, driving even the country’s
most prominent newspapers to the brink of bankruptcy.
In early 2002, the private media continued to seek
to open an independent publishing house. Currently, the state publisher,
Uchkun, prints all independent publications based in the capital, Bishkek.
On January 14, the government approved the Provisional Regulation on Publishing
Activities, which grants the Justice Ministry licensing rights and limits
printing rights to partially or wholly state-owned companies. Though officials
claimed that the new statute would “prevent subversive ideological and
propaganda work of various extremist religious centers,” the independent
press believed that the true goal of the regulation was to thwart efforts
spearheaded by the international community to create an independent publisher.
In late May, a wave of popular protest forced Akayev to rescind the regulation.
When officials arrested Akayev’s political rival,
parliamentarian Azimbek Beknazarov, in January on charges of abusing power
and for official misconduct allegedly committed seven years earlier, mass
protests erupted in the southern Aksy Region. After several peaceful protesters
were killed during clashes with police in mid-March, the opposition called
for Akayev’s resignation, while the prime minister and the Cabinet quit.
During this political crisis, Kyrgyzstan’s media
split along political lines. Pro-government outlets blamed violence on
the opposition, while the independent and opposition media faulted the
government. Meanwhile, a state commission investigating the killings found
that the National Broadcasting Company’s “biased reporting” had in part
incited unrest. In response, the president created a public council to
monitor the broadcaster. In June, the case against Beknazarov was dropped.
Amid this souring political climate, the state readily
muzzled the independent press. In late January, Uchkun refused to print
the independent Moya Stolitsa–Novosti, reportedly in retaliation
for its strong criticism of the Akayev government and family. After the
independent weekly Res Publica offered to print Moya Stolitsa–Novosti
on its pages, Uchkun suspended Res Publica’s publication, citing
a fine owed in an earlier defamation lawsuit. Both newspapers continued
to post online versions and resumed print publication in May. Res Publica
was forced to pay the hefty fine.
Meanwhile, politicians and businessmen continued
to file libel lawsuits against
publications that covered official corruption. Moya Stolitsa–Novosti
found itself embroiled in a number of politically motivated cases and
in danger of bankruptcy. The newspaper’s supporters rushed to create the
Committee to Defend the Newspaper
Moya Stolitsa, which protested what they believed was a political
campaign to destroy the publication.
One of the most bizarre cases came after State Secretary
Osmonakun Ibraimov accused Moya Stolitsa–Novosti of mocking the
Kyrgyz people’s “national sentiment” in an October 4 article that expressed
doubt about the officially recognized age of Kyrgyzstan—2,200 years. The
government has planned an extravagant celebration of the state’s 2,200th
anniversary in 2003. After Ibraimov’s statement, the newspaper faced a
deluge of libel lawsuits from Kyrgyz citizens seeking damages. Most notably,
a man named Akin Toktaliyev, feeling that, as a Kyrgyz citizen, he was
libeled by the article’s disparaging tone, sued the paper, seeking 5 million
soms (US$108,200) and 50,000 soms (US$1,080) from the newspaper and the
author, respectively. The verdict was scheduled to be announced in early
2003.
Moya Stolitsa-Novosti also faced extensive
verbal government harassment for its unyielding criticism of official
corruption and abuse of power, with the Internal Affairs Ministry going
so far as to say the paper contributed to interethnic strife and instability
by criticizing law enforcement authorities.
January 19
Moya Stolitsa–Novosti

The Uchkun Publishing House, a state-run
monopoly, ceased printing the independent daily Moya Stolitsa–Novosti,
citing lack of contract for the year 2002. The popular newspaper is known
for its criticism of official corruption and abuse of power. The newspaper
sued the publisher, and on January 29, a Bishkek court ordered Uchkun
to print Moya Stolitsa–Novosti until the legal case against Uchkun
is
heard in court. However, a few days later, on February 4, the same court
reversed
that ruling.
Another publication, the independent weekly
Res Publica, offered to print Moya Stolitsa–Novosti on its
pages beginning on January 22, but Uchkun soon refused to print Res
Publica. Both newspapers continued to post online versions.
Sources at Moya Stolitsa–Novosti
told CPJ that on May 3, Uchkun announced that it was ready to resume printing
the newspaper, but only after Moya Stolitsa–Novosti withdrew its
January lawsuit against the publisher. The newspaper refused. Uchkun began
printing the publication again on May 22, after reaching an agreement
with Moya Stolitsa–Novosti editor-in-chief Aleksandr Kim.
January 21
Res Publica

After the Uchkun Publishing House refused
on January 19 to print an independent daily Moya Stolitsa–Novosti,
the independent weekly Res Publica offered to print the newspaper
on its pages. As a result, Moya Stolitsa–Novosti transferred its
paper stock to Res Publica and notified Uchkun in a letter. However,
Uchkun suspended Res Publica’s printing, citing a fine owed in
an earlier defamation lawsuit. The newspaper continued to post an online
version. In early May, Res Publica resumed publication, after paying
a hefty fine.
December 31
Lyudmila Zholmukhamedova, Moya Stolitsa–Novosti
Moya Stolitsa–Novosti

In late December, Akin Toktaliyev, who
claimed to be a private citizen with no
government connections, sued Moya Stolitsa–Novosti for defamation.
He said he was defamed by an October 4 article by Zholmukhamedova, which
expressed skepticism about the officially recognized age of Kyrgyzstan’s
statehood—2,200 years. The government has planned an extravagant celebration
of the anniversary in 2003.
Toktaliyev claimed that, as a Kyrgyz citizen,
he was defamed by the article’s demeaning tone. He sought 5 million soms
(US$108,220) from the paper and 50,000 soms (US$1,080) from Zholmukhamedova
in damages. The lawsuit came after
State Secretary Osmonak‘n Ibraimov accused the paper of mocking the Kyrgyz
people’s “national sentiment” in the October 4 article. At year’s end,
the case was ongoing.
|