|
|
|
QATAR
Operating from the tiny, gas-rich Persian Gulf monarchy
of Qatar, the 24-hour satellite news channel Al-Jazeera continued to break
news and spark controversy in 2002. During the last six years, the station
has helped transform television news in the Arab world through bold, uncensored
programming and raucous political debates that reach millions in the Middle
East and beyond.
A year after making headlines across the globe with
its coverage from Afghanistan and its broadcasts of Osama bin Laden’s
taped messages, the network remained the most influential news channel
in the region.
As in previous years, Al-Jazeera continued to trigger
official complaints and reprisals from governments across the Middle East
for its provocative coverage. In May, Bahraini authorities barred the
station’s reporters from covering the country’s municipal elections, alleging
that the station “harms Bahrain and Bahrain’s citizens” and is a medium
for “Zionist infiltration in the Gulf region.” In Jordan, the government
closed the station’s Amman bureau after a guest on a talk show criticized
the country’s relationship with Israel and mocked King Abdullah’s limited
knowledge of Arabic. Jordan also pulled its ambassador from Qatar’s capital,
Doha, in August for four months in protest. Saudi Arabia did the same
in late September because of coverage it deemed anti-Saudi. Meanwhile,
governments throughout the region issued formal protests, while their
own domestic media launched acerbic attacks against the channel.
For all of Al-Jazeera’s successes, critics in the
Arab world highlight the station’s soft coverage of Qatari affairs and
its failure to criticize the country’s ruling family with the same zeal
it uses for other leaders.
In 2001, the station’s US$140 million start-up grant
from the Qatari government expired, and station officials announced that
the channel would begin operating independent of government financing.
It is unclear whether the government still provides money, or if the station
can survive without government backing.
Other broadcast and print media in Qatar do not
display the same flair as Al-Jazeera, although some papers are considered
more liberal than their counterparts elsewhere in the Gulf. Authorities
have taken a number of encouraging steps to free the media since Qatar’s
emir, Hamed bin Khalifa al-Thani, deposed his father in a bloodless 1995
coup, including abolishing the Information Ministry and ending formal
censorship. Nevertheless, self-censorship remains common, and the local
media avoid direct criticism of the emir and other sensitive political
topics.
Although the print media are in private hands, ownership
is closely linked with the government through personal relations. The
government is responsible for licensing publications, and several criminal
statutes exist that can be employed against critics. Under the Press Law,
for example, it is prohibited to “criticize” the emir or to publish news
that “harms supreme national interests.” Foreign publications can be censored,
and the state controls Internet access.
In October, Feras al-Majalli, a Jordanian national
working for Qatar State Television, was sentenced to death for spying.
It remains unclear how credible the charges against him are. Many observers,
however, suspect that al-Majalli is being used as a pawn in the building
tensions between Qatar and Jordan. According to al-Majalli’s lawyer, his
client’s trial was plagued by irregularities, including the state’s appointment
of new judges prior to the verdict. Al-Majalli has appealed the case.
|