Blog   |   Ivory Coast

The struggle continues for power, and media, in Ivory Coast

Soldiers guard state television station RTI. (AFP)

In Ivory Coast, the tense post-election dispute between incumbent President Laurent Gbagbo and rival and self-proclaimed president-elect Alassane Ouattara is a power struggle for control of national institutions--including the sole state media outlet, Radiodiffusion Télévision Ivoirienne (RTI).

Two parallel governments now claim power in Ivory Coast since the disputed results of the November 28 runoff between Ouattara, who proclaimed himself president after the Independent Electoral Commission and international institutions named him the winner, and Gbagbo, who was declared the victor by the Constitutional Council--the supreme Ivorian electoral body. Ivorian security forces, which have remained loyal to Gbagbo, have surrounded Ouattara's headquarters at the Golf Hotel in Abidjan, the economic capital; at the same time, Ouattara is protected by a United Nations peacekeeping force.

In this tense standoff, both sides are vying for control of RTI. From the besieged hotel, Ouattara's pick to run Ivorian national public broadcaster RTI, Brou Aka Paskal, told CPJ via telephone that he had not been able to take up his new post since his appointment. "I have been at the Golf Hotel and I do not go out," he said.

In a December 15 press conference, Gbagbo's communications minister, Ouattara Gnonzié, threatened state media employees who recognized Ouattara as the winner. "These people have made themselves outlaws," he said. "They must be removed from their posts if they hold responsibilities." The next day, Ouattara supporters marched to the headquarters of RTI to oust the Gbagbo-appointed director, Brou Amessan, and install Paskal, but soldiers loyal to Gbagbo guarding the complex violently dispersed the march. Thirty people died.

Cut off from the state media, Ouattara's self-proclaimed government uses the international media and an improvised radio station to make itself heard. The station, called Radio Côte d'Ivoire, la Voix du Rassemblement, broadcasts political statements, music, and call-in programs 24 hours a day from the Golf Hotel and is also on the Internet at ADOsolutions.ci, Lancine Koné, a reporter with the station, told CPJ. On December 13, RTI broadcast a statement from the National Broadcasting Council--which is loyal to Gbagbo's government--calling it a "pirate radio station" broadcasting on unauthorized frequencies.

The United Nations, which recognizes Outtara as president, has also incurred the wrath of Gbagbo's government for its coverage through its Radio ONUCI FM. According to Koné, ONUCI FM calls Ouattara the "president-elect" and Gbagbo the "former president." On December 15, Gnonzié compared ONUCI FM to Radio Mille Collines in Rwanda, whose inflammatory broadcasts helped stoke the 1994 genocide. "They call for rebellion, they ask populations to rise up, they call on northern populations to descend on Abidjan," he said.

In an interview with CPJ, UNOCI  spokesman Hamadoun Touré denied the minister's accusations. "We give voice to both Gbagbo's and Ouattara's sides. Radio ONUCI FM is in journalism and not propaganda," he said. "It is RTI which is making propaganda that incites to hatred."

On the other side, Gnonzié denied accusations that RTI was inciting hatred. RTI is a state media outlet that "covered all views and respected the institutions of the republic and the Ivorian constitution," he said. "If the Constitutional Council recognizes Gbagbo as the elected president of Ivory Coast, it is normal for RTI to support him," he told CPJ. "If Mr. Allassane Ouattara wishes to speak as an opponent, we could give him voice, but not as president, because the Ivorian institutions recognize only Mr. Gbagbo as president."

Since Ivory Coast's independence in 1960, RTI has always been under the control of the ruling power. In January 2010, hundreds of opposition supporters organized a peaceful march to RTI headquarters to denounce what they said was subjugation of the national broadcaster by Gbagbo's supporters. Following the November 28 elections, RTI repeatedly broadcast footage of alleged victims of purported violence in the northern part of the country (Ouattara hails from an ethnic group living in the north of the country which is considered his stronghold), according to CPJ research. RTI exclusively aired views supporting such allegations and backing the premise that the ballots in the north should be thrown out on account of the alleged violence. When Gbagbo's government imposed a ban on French news channels for broadcasting live the announcement of election results by the Electoral Commission that declared Ouattara the winner, RTI aired news and debates lambasting the French media and accusing them of interference.

Yet RTI is under its own sort of attack. According to Gnonzié, the station's broadcasts were scrambled on December 21 by "unidentified persons." Viewers in the countryside hardly receive RTI broadcasts anymore and the station has experienced disturbances on its satellite transmissions, according to local reports. Meanwhile, Ivoirians are turning to the variety of politicized newspapers that continue reporting on the situation, the Internet--where they can listen to the suspended French news channels--and news websites like Abidjan.net, according to CPJ research. They are also interacting with their compatriots in the diaspora through social media sites like Facebook and Twitter where the #civ2010 (for "Côte d'Ivoire 2010") hashtag has become popular.

Nassirou Diallo is an intern in CPJ's Africa Program.

Published

Like this article? Support our work

Comments

yourself b) This is a perfect satiution where the human rights focus on a political satiution can lead to stalemate. Because, as I said on my blog, if if does appear that Outtara condoned the crimes committed by his supporters and if the international community is to be consistent with its current trend, it should call for at the very least an investigation into him as well, which, if it leads to his indictment, would create an unwelcome political vaccum in the country. Of course, the ICC could pull a Bemba on us, by going after a rebel leader, but leaving Ouattara out of it, but that would not look good I would think c) putting Outtara aside, I see your point about Victor's justice, of course, but I'm a bit skeptical about the reconciliation discourse as well. I think it's unrealistic at this stage. You cannot expect such a fractured society to mend after a bloody, and deeply embedded, civil conflict. d) in the same way, you can't expect a fair accountability process to be initiated from a short-term perspective. Even if the ICC is waiting in the shadows, it should be a little patient before considering that Ivory Coast has failed. More generally on this, I think this is one problem with how complementarity functions today, with its extremely case-specific focus . Some have laughed the Kenyan admissibility challenge out of court. It is certainly weak from a purely legal point of view, in light of current ICC practice. But I find the expectations too high on how fast we expect prosecutions. The ICC has been functioning for 9 years now and has not completed a single trial! What is the standard of expediency in that case for State parties? e) which brings me to my last point: from the ICC's perspective, I'm not sure it's not getting involved in too many satiutions in relation to its logistical capacity and its budget.I don't have the perfect solution, of course, and it's certainly frustrating from a human rights angle, but I think that we have too many expectations for how a society mends after conflict, expectations which are not borne out by any serious historical/sociological analysis of nation-building in the past.