Click here to read
more about press freedom conditions in ANGOLA
New
York, September 11, 2000--- A draft Angolan press law poses a
grave threat to press freedom in that country, according to the Committee
to Protect Journalists (CPJ), which has conducted an analysis of the
bill made public in July of this year by Angolan social communications
minister Hendrik Vaal Neto. [Read
the bill]
While Vaal Neto described the proposed bill as a "decisive step in
the process of consolidating" Angolan democracy, CPJ's analysis of
the text shows that clauses relating to state security, military or
state secrets, and criminal libel would put new restrictions on the
ability of journalists to report the news.
Under the proposed legislation, defamation is a
criminal offense punishable by lengthy jail sentences and severe fines.
Even more ominously, under Article 57 it is a crime punishable
by two to eight years in prison to "publish, disseminate or reproduce
news or facts of the national or foreign press, which attack the honor
and reputation of the President of the Republic." In cases involving
defamation of the president of Angola, foreign heads of state, or
their representatives, Article 58 bars judges from admitting
the so-called truth defense.
Similar statutes contained in the current law ("Lei de Imprensa" of
June 1991) have been used repeatedly to prosecute Angolan journalists
who have criticized President José Eduardo dos Santos or questioned
his policies.
"We call on the Angolan government to withdraw the proposed press
law from consideration by the National Assembly," said CPJ executive
director Ann Cooper. "If passed, this law will make it practically
impossible for journalists in Angola to cover any matter relating
to the country's political life without risking incarceration."
According to a growing body of international law, including Article
19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, statutes that define
defamation as a criminal offense violate the most basic standards
for freedom of expression. Such statutes have a chilling effect on
expression because they allow leaders to use prison sentences, or
the threat of imprisonment, to stifle criticism and public debate.
In a democracy, public officials, particularly the head of state,
must tolerate criticism, even caustic criticism. Far from allowing
such criticism, the proposed legislation would give the president
of Angola and other public officials special protection under the
law. CPJ therefore urges Angolan authorities to revise the press law
so that defamation and libel become civil, rather than criminal, offenses.
The proposed press law also introduces a welter of regulations that
could greatly impede the ability of journalists to work freely. For
instance, the bill grants government authorities the right to decide
who is a journalist (Article 78), and to seize or ban publications
at their discretion (Article 25). It also prescribes prison
sentences for Angolan reporters who quote facts published by foreign
media that "attack the honor and decorum" of Angolan state officials.
A special clause, Article 62, authorizes Angolan courts to
ban foreign publications "if they place public order at risk, violate
individual rights on repeated occasions, or incite ... crime."
Among other proposed articles that threaten the ability of journalists
to work freely in Angola are the following:
Article 49, which bans the unlawful disclosure of "state or
military secrets." For the purposes of the proposed bill, a military
secret is defined as "news or information pertaining to the preparation
of internal or external defense of the State, the preparation of military
campaigns by the armed forces and their strategy, military techniques
and the composition of the forces and their respective itineraries."
Those who violate this provision face a punishment of up to eight
years in prison. A footnote to the article states that the court sentence
may "be aggravated in general terms if the crime is committed in times
of war."
Article 50, which bars "subversion of the political and social
order" including the promotion of "war propaganda, or the actions
of armed rebellion or separatist groups ... " This offense is punishable
by a prison term of between eight and 12 years and a fine, "if no
heavier punishment fits the crime."
Article 53, which prohibits the publication of "false news,
unfounded rumors, or distorted facts" likely to cause despondency,
especially in "the banking or financial system." Journalists convicted
under Article 53 face an unspecified "heavy" prison term,
coupled with a fine.
Article 54, under which offending "public morals and good habits"
is a crime punishable by two to eight years in prison, plus a fine.
Under the new law, publishers can be held liable in defamation cases
involving one or more of their reporters. If a reporter is convicted
of defamation, the publisher can be fined (though not jailed) for
the same offense. Moreover, the law allows judges to suspend editors
for up to three years after three adverse court rulings within the
previous three years.
While Article 35 of the Angolan Constitution states that "freedom
of expression [... ] may not be subject to any censorship, especially
political, ideological, or artistic," Article 23 of the proposed
bill requires news organizations to adopt a so-called editorial statute
"which clearly defines their orientation and objectives." The editorial
statute, which must be reprinted at the start of every calendar year,
is to be submitted to the authorities within ten days of its publication.
"We urge Angolan authorities to withdraw the proposed press law and
to work openly with journalists, legislators, and the general public
to develop an adequate law that protects rather than punishes critical
journalism," said Cooper. "In order to meet international standards
regarding press freedom, any new legislation must at a minimum eliminate
criminal penalties for defamation, including criticism of public officials,
and remove restrictions imposed in the name of 'state security.' The
proposed law fails on all counts."
END