|
Tashkent, June 10, 2002—A delegation from the Committee to Protect
Journalists (CPJ) today completed a nine-day mission to Uzbekistan by
calling on President Islam Karimov to free three jailed journalists
and to change government policies that severely restrict press freedom
in the country.
In recent weeks, Uzbek officials formally abolished prior censorship.
But local newspaper editors have been warned that they will be held
personally accountable for what they publish, limiting the impact of
this step.
Uzbek authorities also encourage self-censorship by threatening critical
journalists with imprisonment. Other tactics include lawsuits in politicized
courts, harassment by police and security forces, arbitrary implementation
of media regulations, an politically motivated tax inspections.
CPJ found that the government's harsh policies have
succeeded in creating a culture of self-censorship in the country. Local
journalists rarely cover official corruption, human rights abuses, or
the activities of opposition political parties and Islamic organizations.
CPJ met with Uzbek government officials, local journalists, foreign
correspondents, Western diplomats, and human rights activists in Samarkand
and Tashkent, the capital.
"At a time when the entire world is paying close attention to Uzbekistan's
human rights record, the Karimov government continues to stifle most
attempts at independent speech in the country," said Peter Arnett, a
Pulitzer Prizewinning war correspondent, formerly with CNN and The
Associated Press, who serves on CPJ's board of directors and was a member
of CPJ's delegation to Uzbekistan.
"For the sake of Uzbek democracy and Uzbekistan's international
reputation, we call on President Karimov to ensure that all journalists
in the country are able to work without fear of official harassment,"
Arnett said.
In addition to Arnett, the delegation included CPJ's editorial and program
director Richard M. Murphy and Europe and Central Asia program coordinator
Alex Lupis.
Recommendations
The CPJ delegation made several recommendations whose implementation
could help improve press freedom conditions in the near future:
- Immediately release three Uzbek journalists who are in jail for
their professional work: Muhammed Bekjanov and Iusuf Ruzimuradov,
of the banned opposition newspaper Erk, and Madzid Abduraimov,
of the national weekly Yangi Asr.
- Provide official assurances that independent broadcaster Shukhrat
Babadjanov, who was forced to flee into exile because of serious threats
of imprisonment on false charges, will be able to return to Uzbekistan
safely and reopen ALC Television, a TV station in Urgench, a northern
Uzbekistan city, that was closed for politically motivated reasons.
- Provide assurances that the government will stop using politically
motivated lawsuits to harass independent publications such as the
Samarkand newspaper Oyna.
- Promote a culture of openness and transparency in the government.
Officials should no longer fear punishment for granting on-the-record
interviews to journalists and providing them with information about
state policies.
- Reform or abolish the State Press Committee and the Inter-Agency
Coordination Committee (MKK), which are jointly responsible for licensing
and regulating the local press. In particular, the State Press Committee
should not have arbitrary power to withdraw media licenses.
- Allow the establishment of an independent broadcasting association
to advocate on behalf of private radio and television stations.
- Grant international broadcasters such as the BBC and Radio Liberty
access to FM frequencies that will allow them to reach a wider audience
in Uzbekistan.
- Establish an independent commission of legal experts and local journalists
to review the laws on slander, libel, access to information, status
of journalists, the mass media and other applicable regulations.

|
Monday, June 10, 2002
Statement
by CPJ board member Peter Arnett in Tashkent, Uzbekistan
Thank you for joining us today. I am personally delighted to be back here
in Uzbekistan. I visited your country several times in 1987 and in 1988
en route to cover the Soviet war in Afghanistan. I must say that Tashkent
is a much improved city today.
This last weekend we visited Samarkand and Bukhara, two truly historic
and beautiful places. Our journey around your country was delightful,
and everyone was most pleasant.
But our primary mission here, as you are well aware, is to look into the
status of the pressthe mediahere in Uzbekistan. I'm afraid
that this picture is very bleak.
Uzbekistan's achievements in establishing its independent image and status
in the world have not been matched by its willingness to allow the flowering
of a free press.
At a time when the entire world is paying close attention to Uzbekistan's
human rights record, the Karimov government continues to stifle most attempts
at independent speech in the country.
In fact, one senior foreign official here told us that one of the worst
features of life in Uzbekistan is the ineffectiveness of the press. He
even compared this media weakness to the situation in neighboring Turkmenistan
not a flattering comparison.
I have been personally dismayed during this visit to hear journalists
express real fear about doing their jobs here. Some have told me that
the consequences of a misstep could be a loss of their jobs and virtual
destitution.
Other reporters have said that to move beyond the narrow limits of news
coverage allowed by the government, to more realistic journalism, is virtually
impossible in Uzbekistan.
I am well aware that your government has made recent statementsand
taken some actionsthat appear to advance the cause of a free press
in Uzbekistan. But the comments of the many journalists I met suggest
that the government has little intention to fulfill its commitments made
to the world to improve democracy here.
During our meetings with government officials on this visit, some insisted
that Uzbekistan is too young a country to move ahead quickly with press
freedom. These officials cited the Western experience of the gradual growth
of a free press.
Yes, freedoms did grow gradually in the United States. But we have them
as an example for the world to follow.
Just as Uzbekistan grows its economy, agriculture, and military organizations
on effective standards established elsewhere in the world, so it canif
it truly wishesmove quickly ahead with the media freedoms that many
countries in the world enjoy today.
For the sake of Uzbek democracy and Uzbekistan's international reputation,
we call on President Karimov to ensure that all journalists in the country
are able to work without fear of official harassment.
Thank you.
|