Dear Mr. Secretary:
The Committee to Protect Journalists is concerned that recent actions
by the Department of Homeland Security have impeded access of foreign
reporters to the United States, reversing long-standing U.S. government
practice.
The detention and deportation of journalists from nations deemed "friendly"
to the United States, and the aggressive and inappropriate questioning
of those reporters send the wrong message to the world about U.S. commitment
to press freedom and tolerance for international scrutiny.
CPJ calls on you to support legislative and other reforms that would facilitate
short-term access to the United States for foreign journalists from nations
deemed "friendly" by the Attorney General. We also urge you to ensure
that U.S. port authorities do not ask inappropriate questions of journalists
about sources and planned reporting.
In May 2003, the Department of Homeland Security changed the de facto
entrance requirements for foreign journalists from the 27 nations deemed
"friendly" to the United States. These journalists must now obtain an
information media visa, also known as an I-visa, for even short-term entry
of 90 days or lessthis, even though other citizens from these same
countries are eligible for a visa waiver for the same short-term visits.
These recent practices, however, run counter to the intent of the Immigration
and Naturalization Act of 1952, whose provisions were designed to facilitate
foreign journalists' access to the United States. These enforcement changes
have instead had a discriminatory effect against journalists; it is now
more difficult for journalists from "friendly" nations to enter the United
States than it is for other, non-journalist citizens from these same countries.
The Department of Homeland Security has maintained that it is merely enforcing
the law in changing the de facto requirements, citing the language of
both the Visa Waiver Program of 1986 and the Immigration and Naturalization
Act of 1952. The Visa Waiver Program applies to non-immigrant visitors
as defined by Section 101(a)(15)(B) of the Immigration and Naturalization
Act; that section excludes from the non-immigrant category individuals
"coming for the purpose of study or of performing skilled or unskilled
labor or as a representative of foreign press, radio, film, or other foreign
information media coming to engage in such vocation."
For nearly 20 years, U.S. port authorities had interpreted the Visa Waiver
Program to apply to all citizens, including journalists, from any of the
27 "friendly" nations seeking temporary U.S. entry of up to 90 days. But
from May 2003 through May 2004, U.S. authorities at Los Angeles International
Airport (LAX) departed from the long-standing practice to deny entry to
at least nine journalists from "friendly" nations, deporting each one.
The journalists were detained with restraints, interrogated and subjected
to body searches.
In May 2004, the U.S. Customs & Border Protection Bureau of the Department
of Homeland Security announced that a "one-time" entrance waiver would
be granted to foreign journalists seeking short-term entrance. Homeland
Security agencies made this change after news reports circulated around
the world describing the unnecessarily harsh treatment of journalists
including Elana Lappin, a British reporter on assignment for the London
daily newspaper, The Guardian.
While we are appreciative of this initial step, we respectfully remind
you that the relevant provisions of Immigration and Naturalization Act
of 1952 were enacted "for the avowed purpose of facilitating the exchange
of information among nations, on a basis of reciprocity," as noted by
the legal scholar, Naomi Schorr, in the July 2001 issue of Bender's
Immigration Bulletin.
We ask you to support legislative and other reforms to facilitate foreign
coverage of this country. One bill, HR 4823 introduced by Representative
Zoe Lofgren (D-CA), would allow foreign journalists from the 27 "friendly"
nations to enter the United States to report for no more than 90 days
without the need for an I-visa,
Our concern about the detentions and deportations of the foreign journalists
is compounded by the nature of their interrogation by U.S. authorities.
In an article describing her May 3 interrogation, The Guardian's Lappin
said she was asked about the nature of her story and the sources she intended
to interview. Australian journalist Sue Smethurst was detained and later
deported after she arrived at LAX last November 14 to interview the singer
Olivia Newton-John. According to a published account, Smethurst was asked
what her story would say, when it would be published, and whether her
publication ran politically sensitive material.
While we recognize that Customs and Border Patrol agents have a responsibility
to screen all visitors, they should be instructed not to ask journalists
about sources and the nature of their reporting. For a representative
of the U.S. government to ask such questions discourages sources from
speaking openly with foreign journalists, thereby having a chilling effect
on their work.
Thank you for your attention to this serious matter.
Sincerely,

Ann Cooper
Executive Director
|